Відео

Is there a way to watch the whole concert?

sanatcinin ismini bilen yazabilirmi.

it's amazing. what is the name of the instrument that kinda like harp?

Очень классно республики Каракалпакстан Юсуф

The true appearance of Chinghiz Khan, the real History of the Tatars and many of Turkic peoples: Perhaps you know, that an outstanding historian-scientist D. Iskhakov wrote: ‘the true history of the Tatars, of the people in every respect historical, is not written yet’. However, recently were published books about the unwritten (hidden) real history of the Tatars by independent Tatar historian Gali Yenikey. His books present a new, or rather ‘well-forgotted old’ information about the real history of the Tatars and other Turkic peoples. It must be said, that in official history there are many falsifications and slanders about the ‘Tatars - wild nomads’ etc., which were written by pro-Chinese, Persian, also both Romanovs and Bolshevik ideologists. However primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names ‘Mongol’ and ‘Tatar’ (‘Tartar’) in the medieval Eurasia: According to data of many medieval sources, the name ‘Mongol’ until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While ‘‘the name ‘Tatar’ was ‘the name of the own ethnos (nation) of Chinghiz Khan'. Also ‘…Chinghiz Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the ‘Mongolian’…’’ (an academician-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century). This confirmed by many little known facts. So in fact Chinghiz Khan was from among the medieval Tatars and the outstanding and progressive leader of the Turkic peoples. It is worth saying that according to many little-known data, the ancient and medieval Tatars were a very developed people both in spiritual and material aspects. It was the medieval Tatars who created the first Constitution of Eurasia, which was called in Tatar ‘Great Yasu’ (in Tatar means 'Great Scripture'). But with time many of their descendants became spiritually disabled and forgot invaluable doctrine and covenants of the creators of Great Yasu... So that the Tatars of Chinghiz Khan - medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among the Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others. And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite to the politicians of the tsars Romanovs and Bolsheviks dictators, which had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations... About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of the Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, which was hidden from us, had been written, in detail and proved, in the book ‘Forgotten Heritage of Tatars’ - it is one of the dooks by Gali Yenikey, translated in Engilsh. There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English language) you can easily find in the Internet: payhip.com/b/Xujb On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Chinghiz Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. In the ancient Tatar historical source ‘About the clan of Chinghiz Khan’ its author gave the words of the mother of Chinghiz Khan: ‘My son Chinghiz looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse’. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar epic. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Chinghiz Khan...’. And here's another interesting thing: We can't keep silent that some 'very important' official historians try to retell the content (or rather, the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikey (Yenikeiev). But they conceal where the information was by them taken from. However it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - this official historians, apparently, do not dare to show the real history of the Tatars, being afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’. But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video of the Institute of history of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan (Russia): ua-cam.com/video/3WqB71gs5bc/v-deo.html - also this portrait is shown there both before and after. This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeiev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Ciingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources. This portrait was used by authors of the video without Yenikeiev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeiev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of the Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC This ‘creativity’ of the official historians is called among the decent people as plagiarism - that is, as theft.

Thanks, it’s very interesting. Well primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names ‘Mongol’ and ‘Tatar’ (‘Tartar’) in the medieval Eurasia: According to information from ancient and medieval sources, translated by the academician-orientalist V. P. Vasiliev (19th century), the name ‘Mongol’ until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While ‘the name ‘Tatar’ was ‘the name of the own ethnos (nation) of Chinghiz Khan …’ , and ‘…Chinghiz Khan and his own people did not speak the language, which we now call the ‘Mongolian’…’ So the medieval Tatars - the own people of Chingiz Khan - were a Turkic people, they are the Ancestors of many modern Turkic peoples. This is confirmed by many little known facts. About all of this and much more from the hidden common history of the Tatars and other kindred Turkic peoples of Eurasia reasonably and argumentatively is written by the independent historian G. R. Yenikey. Here the book by G. R. Yenikey ‘Forgotten heritage of the Tatars’: payhip.com/b/Xujb On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Chingiz Khan. It is his lifetime portrait, which is very little known. Notes to the portrait from this book: ‘...In the ancient Tatar historical source «About the clan of Chingiz -Khan» the author gives the words of the mother of Genghis-Khan: ‘My son Chingiz looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and goes on a white horse...’. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar story. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Chingiz -Khan...’.

🐺🤟🐺🇦🇿🇹🇷🇰🇬🇲🇳🇰🇿🇺🇿🇭🇺🐺🤟🐺 ❤TURKIC-MONGOL WE ARE BROTHERS❤

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

Bu acillsta bende vardim ozaman cumhur başkanını abdullah güldü sevara nazarkhan i ayakta alkışlamıştı. O gece tek canlı söyleyen sevara olmuştu. Sevaradan sonra Tarkan cıktı oda playback söylemişti

Yes chengiz Khan and Attila is TURK and 1299-1923 ottoman empire is TÜRK

Stop cultural appropriation now!

bu şarkıyı türk biri söylüyor değil mi, çok belli

Ажайып керемет куулор. 👍

Варганные инструменты у всех тюркских народов есть, и монголских народов есть, у венгров тоже есть, тупой кыргыз бала жакшылап карап коруп анан айтсан. Жон эле мактана бербей.

Это варганные инстурменты принадлежить только кыргызам.

Olm şu Moğol salaklarına Cengizin ordusunun büyük bi kısmının Türk olduğunu söyleyin benim ingilizcem yok :D bunların bügün ki nüfusu yaklaşık ya 2 milyon yada 3 milyon , eskiden o tarihte daha azdı bügün bizler dünyada herhalde 150 milyonu geçtik bunlardan daha çoğuz. Böylece Cengizin ordusu büyük çoğunlu Türk olduğu bir kanıtı bu sadece bu değil ...diğer kaynaklarda söylüyor KADİR MISIROĞLU BİLENE DİYOR AMK CENGİZİN ORDUSU TÜRK !

NE MUTLU TÜRKÜM DİYEN MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK

TÜRKÜZ NE MUTLU BİZE

Chuvash - Csuvas - Czuwasz - Çuvaş - Čuvaškaja - Чувашки - Kuvaski - Tšuvaši - Tšuvassi - Ch'uvashuri

is fonny！japan and Korea not altaic。

japan and Korea do in here？

Защо я няма България?

Exceptional arrangement

A true fact all mongols has to know: TIRKIC AND WOLVES ARE A SIMBOL ergenekon valley is a grey wolf group that fighted to the end g Khan askd for help from the turks the 40 turks of kursad died in honor of g Khan so show some respect and love for each other we share the same enemy and thats china peace

Why argue about origins.? Turkish or mongols we all shared the same land at one point and kicked some serious ass. Be proud.

wtf fuck are Japan and South korea doing here?!

@healer od Im a tatar turk I live in Turkey and ı can say that there was no border between mongols and turks they lived together.I dont claim that genghis khan was turkic but ı believe that he was half turkic and ı know that he could speak both turkıc language and mongolic language as a native speaker so whatever Turks and Mongols are relative like two cousins.

Such soulful singing

Its in Mongolia China. Its the earliest historical record of the Turks. They built sculptures of their Khans. They were Mongolian.

Hayranlık duymamak, gıpta etmemek mümkün mü?

Love you Turkestan! <3 #TurkeySupportsTurkestan

köroğlu kazak demi:) mükemmel müzik

Yırın adı Ene Say (Ana Çay). Yenisey bize Slav dillerindeki uyarlamalardan sonra geçmiş.

Yaşasın Türk Milleti...

biraz volum yüksek gibi sanki. huun huur tu dan ya da Tuva' lı başka üzisyenlerden dinlemek daha zevkli. ama yine de Türkiye' den bir san'atçının çıkıp da bunu söylemesi bence çok yahşi. en azından nyet güzel. Tuva ya da Altai bölgesinin gırtlak yapısı bu şarkılar için daha uygun. bizdeki hömey onlardaki hömey gibi değil. müzikte kültürde bin yıl kadar süre var. bu çabalar güzel sonuçlar doğuracak elbet.

massacre of tatars by Chingis khan on youtube tnx and stop bullshitting about mongols .

he was born in Mongolia that means he was Mongolian not turkish.u turkish people stop trying to steal our history u cant change nothing at all tnx.

sesi güzel, kendisi güzel.

Dilde, Fikirde, isde, Birlik.yasasin ulu ve kutlu büyük Turan.

Biz Alla Bilen.

Thank you Brother , i hope, one day all the Turkic states will unite .

You are right my Brother! I am from Qazaqstan. We have the same histroy, the same culture, the same heroes and the same religion. No matter what your race is, the most important is idea that we are Turks. Proud to be Turk

Turks of Turkiye , Tatars , Ahiskas , Uighurs, Khazaksz , Kypchaks , Kyrgiz, Cumans , Azeris and many more we are all brothers , but this god-damn politicians divided us and gave us different names, we should remember our history and unite againist European Union.

Turk is a term of Idealogy and this idealogy is about freedom , honour , strenght , and ofcourse bravery. Turkey Turks maybe look different from Turks in Central Asia but that does not make us less Turk than they are. From Thracia to China WE ARE ALL TURK.

Turks in Turkey looking different from the Asian Turks i agree but our soul still Turk our culture is still "Turk" is a term of a idealogy not a race. We are Turk as much as our brothers in Central Asia. And we are proud to be Turk.

There's more: now very few people know that Genghis Khan is a Turk. Tatars of Chingiz-Khan - medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among the Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Tatars, Uighurs, etc. But the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of Persians and Chinese to the West of the World, is still alive. Despite the politicians had divided and scattered this ethnos to "different" nations...

The meaning of the names "Mongol" and "Tatar" in the medieval Eurasia: It is worth saying here that the name "Mongol" until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While “the name "Tatars" was “the name of the native nation of Chingiz-Khan…” , “… Genghis Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the "Mongolian…" (academic-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century).

Muslim, christian, shamanic or atheist LONG LIVE ALL TURKIC PEOPLE ON THE WORLD!!!

Stupid what Union? Turkey is the poor country and is not able to create such a union! Enough to masturbate and scream on the Internet "Union" "Union"! It is better to go out into the street and the love the girls and rejoice wonders of life! This union may not be in this life!

YOU ARE NOT A KAZAKH TURK YOU ARE A KAZAKHRUSSIAN !! STOP THE RUSSIAN FASCISM !! STOP THE RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA !! TURKIC UNITED FROM ANATOLIA TO SAKHA